【求翻译帝】貌似单词都认识，只是...

电影帝

1. Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise.
   
2. 
   
3. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols.
   
4. 
   
5. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.

复制代码

chenben207

看不到啊

电影帝

chenben207 发表于 2012-5-17 23:39
看不到啊

Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise.

But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols.

We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.

shinjiikari189

我什麽都不知道 {:2:}

國風

用1.5级英语的水平看了几句，貌似比较不河蟹 {:2:}

skyline1100

看得懂意思 不懂怎么翻译过来{:18:}

snowhell

试着翻译了一下，大意如下。楼主要求不要太高，这种东西认真翻译是会死人的。

无限制的宽容必然导致宽容的消失。如果我们把无限制的宽容给了那些不宽容者，而且我们不准备保卫一个宽容的社会，使之免于不宽容者的进犯，那么宽容者就会连同宽容一起被消灭。这一提法并不意味着，我们应该总是抑制不容忍理性的话语；只要能用理性观点来反驳他们，用公众舆论来遏制他们，一味抑制肯定是不明智的。
但我们应该声称有权制止他们，如果有必要甚至采用武力。因为他们没有与我们位于同层次上的论据，所以很容易把一个宽容社会所不能宽容的人群区别开：他们会禁止他们的信徒们听取理性观点，因为那都是欺骗性的并且教导他们使用拳头或者手枪来回答理性观点。
因此我们主张，以宽容的名义，有权不容忍偏执的人。我们主张，任何宣扬偏执的场所或者它本身都是非法的，同样我们认为煽动偏执和迫害也是非法的，基于同样的理由，煽动谋杀，拐骗，或者使奴隶制复辟，均为非法。